ALDI AINSDALE - RIGHT STORE, WRONG PLACE, OR...? 'UPDATE 2'

 

As of March 5, 2026, Aldi has launched a virtual consultation for a proposed new store in Sandbrook Road, Ainsdale. 

https://aldiconsultation.co.uk/ainsdale/ 

While many residents view the redevelopment of this "eyesore" site as a positive step, the proposal has several identified flaws and points of contention...

PUBLIC CONCERNS INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING...

Traffic Management Constraints: A primary structural flaw is the restriction on vehicle access. Current plans specify no vehicular access from Sandbrook Road itself; instead, all traffic must enter via a new link through to Liverpool Road along the existing Sandbrook Way.

Infrastructure Stress: Local critics argue that the existing road network cannot support a major discount store alongside the £33 million Riverside Housing development currently being built on the same road. Opponents claim there is "no infrastructure" for the combined impact of 130 new homes and a high-traffic supermarket.

Air Quality and Environmental Risks: Due to its proximity to the A565 Liverpool Road—a site already near national air quality limits for Nitrogen Dioxide—planners have warned that any development significantly increasing car journeys could push emissions to dangerous levels.

Residential Amenity Impact: The site is adjacent to existing housing, St John Stone's Church, and the Ainsdale Centre for Health and Wellbeing. The Brookdale Centre for dementia sufferers is also close by. Concerns include noise and light pollution from delivery vehicles and the car park, which may negatively impact upon "sensitive" nearby residents.

Ownership Complexity: The site has historically suffered from "fragmented multiple-ownership," which has delayed regeneration for years. While Sefton Council has moved to acquire these leases, the legal and physical assembly of the land remains a complex hurdle.

 

Ecological concerns: Construction work will also threaten mature trees and wildlife in this peaceful space that is set to become a possible noise - ridden, gridlocked, nightmare for some. Red squirels (a legally protected species) have been spotted in the area. Foxes also run through the area (travelling from the adjacent Woodvale Woodland) into local gardens, as do hedgehogs. In summer bats hunt over the trees. Various birds species utilise the trees on Sandbrook Way for nesting and roosting. 

Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG) is a mandatory requirement in England's planning system that ensures new developments leave the natural environment in a measurably better state than before, with a minimum 10% increase in biodiversity.  

It worth remembering that modern property buyers often prioritise 'green infrastructure.' Removing mature trees lowers the curb appeal and thermal comfort of these units. Thoughtless felling trades long-term property value for a slightly easier construction phase. Trees are a real asset to profit margins rather than an pesky evological obstacle to tractors. By removing established trees, devolopers are creating a 'Biodiversity Deficit' that may cost significantly more to offset off-site under BNG (Biodiversity Net Gain) regulations than it would to simply integrate the existing canopy into the design. Most devepopers know that Off-site mitigation is expensive and logistically difficult.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2021/30/contents 

Above: a Red squirrel in a Sandbrook Road garden only yards away from the proposed Aldi development. 

Above; Several mature trees have existed on the Sandbrook Way area for decades. 

Above: Also, under threat - more mature trees where the planned entrance on Liverpool Road will be to Aldi's proposed store. 

 The main issue at hand remains. Is this a case of the right store in the wrong place? 

Some of us have pushed hard for improvement over many years in this area. Others now pay lip-service to the numerous issues that exist today in a 'johnny-come-lately' capacity. This results in them having to catch up with prior events after they initially jump in at the front of the queue and proceed to throw their weight about, to no avail. 

The Brook eyesore of course must be addressed, and the proposed Aldi store may well be a good idea, yet proper consideration must also be allotted for the native ecosystem.  

See also

https://pat-regan.blogspot.com/2017/02/repair-work-on-woodvales-eyesore.html

The terrible decayed state of properties on the precinct has been an  ongoing problem for years. Wild birds have even required rescuing, after becoming trapped in loose wiring.   

Many residents are asking .... Is Aldi willing to consider the natural green infrastructure and work sensitively around the mature trees, OR will it be a case of ripping through as fast as possible, with zero concern for nature and true responsibilities towards Biodiversity Net Gain? 

Destroying mature trees and replacing with small saplings, that will most likely be vandalised, is in no way conforming with BNG regulations. Of course, most developers know this already and will simply rely on public intransigence and  ignorance to bypass proper regulations. 

Of course, some developers are professional yet, as we can see below, some do break the law on occasion and pay the price... 

 Significant Recent Fines (2023–2026)

Enfield Landowner and Contractor (£255,000): In May 2023, Ali Matur and contractor Robert Bush were ordered to pay over £255,000 in fines, confiscation, and costs. They illegally felled more than 270 protected trees—including oak, ash, and yew—within the Clay Hill conservation area.

Hounslow Developer (£13,000+): In June 2025, a developer in Osterley was fined more than £13,000 for unlawfully felling protected trees in a conservation area. Local residents and councillors flagged the breach, which the council described as a "clear and unacceptable" flouting of rules designed to protect biodiversity.

East Riding Developers (£6,000+): In December 2025, Wayne Low and Richmond Properties were fined a combined £6,600 for damaging a sycamore and felling a healthy pear tree in the Etton Conservation Area. The sycamore alone was assessed to have an amenity value of up to £12,282.

Bradford Developer (£4,600): In October 2024, Khalil Hussain was fined £1,666 plus £3,000 in costs for felling six 100-year-old protected oaks in his garden. Neighbours expressed anger at the relatively low fine (approx. £277 per tree) for destroying healthy, mature specimens. 

GRIDLOCK IN WOODVALE... 

Many residents are rightly concerned about the traffic congestion issue. Therefore, the following letter, or similar, may prove useful to present to Aldi .... 

Subject: Formal Consultation Response: Proposed Aldi Development, Sandbrook Way, Ainsdale

To the Aldi Consultation Team,

I am writing to submit my formal feedback regarding the proposed retail development at Sandbrook Way. While the regeneration of this brownfield site is noted, the current proposal raises significant concerns regarding highway safety, cumulative traffic impact, and the contradiction of local Net Zero objectives.

To ensure this consultation moves beyond "lip service," I require specific answers to the following technical points before the planning application is submitted to Sefton Council:

1. Cumulative Impact Assessment: Has the Transport Assessment (TA) modelled the peak-hour vehicle movements of this store in conjunction with the full occupancy of the 130 new homes at the adjacent Riverside development? Assessing these projects in isolation fails to account for the total strain on the Sandbrook Road corridor.
2. Junction Capacity (RFC Values): What is the predicted Ratio of Flow to Capacity (RFC) for the Sandbrook Road/Sandbrook Way access point during peak Saturday trading (11:00–14:00)? Any value exceeding 0.85 indicates a failing junction; I request that these figures be made public.
3. Baseline Data Accuracy: In what year and under what road conditions were the baseline traffic counts for this proposal taken? Data collected during recent or ongoing roadworks for the 33kv cable installation will not provide a legally robust representation of "normal" traffic flow.
4. Swept-Path Analysis: Please provide confirmation that a standard articulated HGV can enter and exit the site in a forward gear without over-running the kerb or requiring the full width of Sandbrook Road, particularly given the existing residential parking constraints.
5. Net Zero and Infrastructure Irony: Given the 8 proposed EV charging points, has a formal Utility Impact Assessment confirmed that no further disruptive road excavations on Sandbrook Road will be required to upgrade the local substation for this commercial load?
6. Policy Conflict: How does the addition of 117 car parking spaces—designed to draw vehicle traffic from across the region—align with Sefton Council’s "Eco Vision" for Ainsdale, which explicitly prioritises traffic calming and carbon reduction?

I look forward to receiving a detailed technical response to these points rather than generic marketing materials.

Yours sincerely,

[Your Name]
[Your Postcode]

Send to - north@consultation-online.co.uk 

More: 

https://pat-regan.blogspot.com/2017/01/sandbrook-way-planters-scheme-moving.html 

https://pat-regan.blogspot.com/2018/11/great-crested-newt-in-woodvale.html 

 

Calls for a UK Caliphate and why it rings alarm bells

 Back in 2014 the BBC presented a small list of ordinary Muslim opinions regarding a possible caliphate in the UK. Some were indifferent to the possibility, yet some were in favour of implementing this strict Sharia law - ruled system. 

Here are to just two examples 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/newsbeat-28774984 

This was a snapshot of ordinary muslim opinion from 10 years ago. 

So what does a UK caliphate actually mean? 

The BBC also stated: 

Many of those who want a caliphate today compare it to having an Islamic superpower - "an America for Muslims". It would also be a place to live that would be governed by Sharia law, the Islamic legal system. 

However, the term 'caliphate' apparently sounds alarm bell within the UK Government's security forces. Their prescribed listing of terrorist groups that support a repressive Sharia law - oriented type system of caliphate include the following.

Al Ghurabaa - Proscribed July 2006

Groupe Islamique Combattant Marocain (GICM) - Proscribed October 2005

Harakat al-Muqawamah al-Islamiyyah (Hamas) – Proscription extended November 2021

Harakat-Ul-Jihad-Ul-Islami (Bangladesh) (HUJI-B) - Proscribed October 2005

Hizb ut-Tahrir - Proscribed January 2024

Imarat Kavkaz (IK) also known as the Caucasus Emirate - Proscribed December 2013

Islamic Army of Aden (IAA) - Proscribed March 2001

Indian Mujahideen (IM) - Proscribed July 2012

Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) also known as Dawlat al-‘Iraq al-Islamiyya, Islamic State of Iraq (ISI), Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and Dawlat al Islamiya fi Iraq wa al Sham (DAISh) and the Islamic State in Iraq and Sham - Proscribed June 2014

Jamaat ul-Ahrar (JuA) - Proscribed March 2015

Jaysh al Khalifatu Islamiya (JKI) which translates as the Army of the Islamic Caliphate –proscribed November 2014

Jund al Khalifa-Algeria (JaK-A) which translates as Soldiers of the Caliphate - Proscribed January 2015

Saved Sect or Saviour Sect - Proscribed July 2006

Turkestan Islamic Party (TIP) also known as East Turkestan Islamic Party (ETIP), East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM) and Hizb al-Islami al-Turkistani (HAAT) – Proscribed July 2016

The list forms a non-exhaustive selection of proscribed terrorist groups, 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/proscribed-terror-groups-or-organisations--2/proscribed-terrorist-groups-or-organisations-accessible-version 

Based on the above, two important questions seem to arise herein.

Is a Sharia - governed caliphate compatible with a democratic UK society ? 

Is such a system a threat to the UK's national security? 

WHICH PARTIES SUPPORT THE BARBARIC RITUAL OF RELIGIOUS SLAUGHTER (RS)?

 

A land of ‘animal lovers’ they say – well let’s see…

The RSPCA is actively campaigning against non-stun slaughter, including within the halal industry, arguing it causes significant pain and distress to animals. While UK law generally requires stunning, an exemption permits religious slaughter (halal and kosher) without it.

The RSPCA advocates removing this exemption and implementing mandatory, clear labelling for non-stun meat.  

The public consequently have a right to know which political parties are in favour of causing animals “significant pain and distress” to basically satisfy fundamentalist fantasies of what a blood-thirsty Abrahamic godhead apparently demands.

 

THE FOLLOWING PARTIES ARE MAINLY IN FAVOUR OF RITUAL SLAUGHTER…

Labour: Starmer’s government has overtly STATED IT WILL NOT BAN RELIGIOUS SLAUGHTER, citing respect for the rights of Jewish and Muslim communities to eat meat prepared according to their beliefs.

Reform UK: THE PARTY'S OFFICIAL STANCE UNDER NIGEL FARAGE IS THAT IT WILL NOT BAN HALAL OR KOSHER SLAUGHTER.

Conservative Party: The party leadership has consistently confirmed there WOULD BE NO BAN ON RELIGIOUS SLAUGHTER.

LibDems: The party believes in the protection of religious freedoms and generally OPPOSES AN OUTRIGHT BAN ON NON-STUN RELIGIOUS SLAUGHTER (HALAL AND KOSHER). 

Green Party: The official policy is to SUPPORT THE RIGHT TO RELIGIOUS SLAUGHTER (HALAL AND KOSHER), viewing it as an aspect of religious freedom.

 Plaid Cymru: There is NO EVIDENCE OF A PARTY-WIDE BAN ON HALAL, and some members have advocated for improving the availability of halal products for communities. 

Democratic Unionist Party: they are NOT ACTIVELY CAMPAIGNING FOR A TOTAL BAN ON ALL MEAT CERTIFIED AS HALAL. 

Sinn Féin: There is presently NO EVIDENCE THAT SINN FÉIN PLANS TO BAN HALAL SLAUGHTER IN EITHER IRELAND OR NORTHERN IRELAND. The party’s official policy focuses on protecting religious freedoms.

SNP: the Scottish National Party (SNP) has NO OFFICIAL POLICY TO BAN HALAL SLAUGHTER. The party generally supports current legislation that allows for religious exemptions to pre-stunning requirements.

Social Democratic and Labour Party:  They have not announced plans to ban halal slaughter.

APNI: The Alliance Party of Northern Ireland (APNI) has no stated policy to ban halal slaughter. 

Your Party: There is no evidence that Jeremy Corbyn's  political movement, Your Party, intends to ban halal slaughter. 

Workers Party of Britain: There is currently no official policy or public statement from the Workers Party of Britain indicating an intention to ban halal slaughter.

 PARTIES THAT OPENLY OPPOSE RITUAL SLAUGHTER

 UKIP: Historically, UKIP was the FIRST BRITISH POLITICAL PARTY TO PROMISE A BAN ON SLAUGHTERING ANIMALS WITHOUT STUNNING.

Restore Britain: Launched in February 2026, THE PARTY PLEDGES TO OUTLAW BOTH HALAL AND KOSHER SLAUGHTER ON "DAY ONE" OF ITS GOVERNMENT.

Advance UK: The official stance of Advance UK, apparently ADVOCATES FOR A BAN ON RELIGIOUS SLAUGHTER WITHOUT PRE-STUNNING.

Consequently, there we have it. Only three parties that will clearly oppose causing ‘significant pain and distress to animals.

 SO – ARE WE REALLY A NATION OF ‘ANIMAL LOVERS’?

Fundamentalist extremism and brutality based on hand-me-down manmade religious fantasies is no excuse for animal torture. It’s high time that humanity ditched 'all' the destructive Abrahamic fables and grew up.  

More: 

KFC all Halal - claim Politicalite 

https://pat-regan.blogspot.com/2019/10/kfc-all-halal-claim-politicalite.html

Ritual slaughter of suppressed species for a ‘loving god’ or to keep religious fundamentalists happy?

https://pat-regan.blogspot.com/2014/09/ritual-slaughter-of-suppressed-species.html 

In Pictures: Today's event at the Red Brick Church Hall

 

Time flies when you're having fun. 

Pictures from our indoor car boot/flea market event in Birkdale - 21st February 2026. 

Please check the following link for our next events... 

https://southport-crafts-and-events.jimdosite.com/ 

LIGHTPORT EVENT SOUTHPORT - celebrating the town's "Elegantly Eccentric" identity

Lightport is a brand-new, free immersive light and sound experience that transforms Lord Street in Southport into a 400-metre walk-through "rainbow of colour and creativity". 

Produced by international artists Lucid Creates, the event features a series of interactive light installations, including high-tech lasers, mirrored LEDs, and a towering 10-metre luminous rainbow finale called ARC. 

MORE PICTURES OF THE EVENT...

Lightport serves as the official launch for Southport 2026, a year-long programme of major events celebrating the town's "Elegantly Eccentric" identity. It is funded by Sefton Council and the Liverpool City Region Combined Authority to boost local tourism and engagement during the winter months.  

The "Elegantly Eccentric" identity was introduced as the core vision for the Southport 2026 cultural programme. The phrase and the surrounding branding were officially launched by a collaboration of local leaders and creative directors: 

Claire McColgan CBE: As the Associate Director of Culture for the Liverpool City Region and Director of Culture Liverpool, she has been a primary spokesperson for the "Elegantly Eccentric" project, describing it as a way to turn the town into something that celebrates its unique, flamboyant history.

Patrick Hurley (MP for Southport): He has strongly endorsed the branding, stating that the "Elegantly Eccentric" vision "captures that spirit [of Southport] perfectly and updates it for the 2020s".

Councillor Marion Atkinson: The Leader of Sefton Council launched the programme alongside McColgan, framing the identity as a tribute to Southport's history of "spectacle and eccentric entertainment".

Dates: Saturday 14th – Monday 16th February 2026.

Time: 5pm – 9pm each evening.

Cost: Completely free; no tickets or booking required.

Route: A 400m trail divided into four zones:

Mermaid Gardens: Immersive illuminated landscape and mirrored LEDs.

Monument Square: Features "Gradients" (layered light sheets) and overhead laser spectacles.

Christ Church Gardens: Pulsing neon light experience.

Town Hall Gardens: The "ARC" finale, a massive walkthrough rainbow made of 7,000 pixels.

Advance UK’s (and Restore Britain's) 'Church Spin' sincerely needs a reality check!

 

Advance UK’s promotional video sincerely needs a reality check. Within this abstract clip we are treated to images of invading Romans being faced off by Celts with a woman at the helm, who is presumably the Iceni Queen Boudicca. 

The narrator quips – “Rome arrived but we resisted”.

He however failed to clarify that the Romans and the Celt were at the time Pagans, not Christians.

The image suddenly jumps to the St George Cross flag with lofty claims that the land was ‘forged on Christianity’.

The St. George’s Cross (red cross on a white background) first appeared as an English emblem in the late 12th to 13th century, initially used by soldiers in the Crusades. So, we have suddenly jumped many centuries here and dismissed many essential aspects of our native British Pagan heritage.

The massive Pagan achievements that actually created the British nation were conveniently omitted from this cherry-picking pro-Church political video.  

When the Romans officially invaded and conquered Britain in 43 CE, the country was not Christian. The native Britons practiced Celtic Paganism, and the incoming Romans brought their own polytheistic, state-sponsored Pagan religion. 

Any talk of 'resistance' was undertaken by native Pagan warriors, not Christians, and one great example would be Queen Boudica.

Queen Boudica was the 1st-century Pagan Queen of the Iceni tribe in Britain who led a massive uprising against Roman occupation in 60-61 AD. 

Known as the "Victorious Woman," she has become a lasting British national symbol of our Pagan resistance against oppression, independence, and the defense of our indigenous ways. 

At the end of this clip, we see a list of famous historical figures, including one‘Caractacus’.

Whilst Boudica fought in the 60s AD, Caratacus was the leader of the Catuvellauni tribe who commanded the British resistance against the initial Roman invasion starting in AD 43, fighting for eight years before his capture.

Again, we see that this is a vital part of our PAGAN heritage and resistance!

Anyone who has foolishly fallen for the absurd Christian propaganda in the video seriously needs to consider the following.

Farming and agriculture were invented by Pagans

Military defence was invented by Pagans.

Architecture was invented by Pagans.

Roads were invented by Pagans.

Coinage was invented by Pagans.

The original traders and merchants were Pagans.

Central heating was invented by Pagans.

Clothing and fashion were invented by Pagans.

Art and philosophy were an expression of the earliest Pagans cultures.

Modern religious traditions, festivals and customs were hijacked from Paganism.

Medicine was invented by Pagans.

Writing was invented by Pagans.

Marine travel was invented by Pagans.

Laws were invented by Paganism.

Democracy was a Pagan invention.

Metalwork was invented by Pagans.

Days of the week and months named via Pagans. 

It is wholly wrong, unjust and manipulative for 'any' political group to misrepresent our native Pagan heritage, via promoting the much later imported foreign religion of Christianity as our only true heritage. 

Rewriting the past to rubber stamp biased missionary narrative by one conquering Abrahamic faith system over overs is the highest form of deceit! Such misleading propaganda is unhelpful and holds no connection to authenticity. To be taken seriously, especially within politics, first of all we need to speak the truth. 

Some months ago, Mr Farage of the Reform Party was also guilty of the very same spin, which I highlighted here: 

https://pat-regan.blogspot.com/2024/06/no-pastor-farage-you-are-100-wrong.html 

I also note here that whilst the UK is in a state of chaos, thanks to the authoritian blunderings of the current Fabian PM and prior to him the last bungling blue-rinse government, I do actually agree with quite a few of the more commonsense aspects promoted by both Advance UK and Reform. 

Nevertheless, I for one will never permit them to bang the old missionary church drum against our native Pagan heritage, without challenge!  

If they want genuine support from the electorate then first, they must promote truth, not discredited eccleciastical religious spin. I realise that they think they will win over floating lip-service Christians with this 'holier-than-thou' approach, yet houses built on such shaky foundations will sink in due course. 

Britain, like other countries, is originally built on ancient Pagan wisdom. Foreign cults like Christianity, Islam, and Judaism are modern eastern imports that have been craftily injected into our native culture, mainly due to shrewd fanancial decisions taken by powerful mind - controllers in high places many centuries ago. 

Addendum: 

RESTORE BRITAIN - latest bible - bashing spin exposed! 

If this Advance UK evangelical nonsense was not enough, we now have Restore Britian foolishly insulting countless Brits, via saying you cannot be a true British patriot unless you are Christian. 

Restore Britain’s fundamentalist fantasist Rupert Lowe and his new fan club haven’t quite grabbed the reality that, like Islam and Judaism, CHRISTIANITY IS IN FACT AN ALIEN ABRAHAMIC FAITH TO THE BRITISH ISLES.  

This land was, like other places, PAGAN eons before the Christian ONE GOD faith system was officially enforced on the British Isles. All the native traditions, festivals and customs etc that Christianity absurdly calls its own were hijacked from our PAGAN ancestors. 

IT’S TIME THAT ADVANCE UK AND RESTORE BRITAIN WOKE UP.  INSULTING MILLIONS OF NONE – CHRISTIAN BRITISH PATRIOTS IS BASICALLY A VERY STUPID IDEA FOR ANY SERIOUS POLITICAL OUTFIT TO UNDERTAKE.  

One could almost think that these two new political parties were little more than MISSIONARY EVANGELICAL OUTREACHES set up to get more reluctant bums back onto church pews. 

Ye gods – save us all from these evangelists in posh suits … I wonder what our heroic Pagan Queen Boudica would have thought about all this...