Housing development must not be an excuse for councils to destroy the UK countryside
Notes
by Southport author, Pat Regan, on Councillor Peter Dowd’s, controversially proposed,
land-flattening policies
Councillor
Peter Dowd, and any faithful parties/individuals that
stand with him on nauseating Greenbelt annihilation proposals, are clearly to
be held fully accountable for an immense ‘Crime
against nature’.
http://www.southportvisiter.co.uk/southport-news/southport-southport-news/2013/06/20/sefton-council-leader-defends-development-proposals-outlined-for-the-borough-101022-33498028/
http://www.southportvisiter.co.uk/southport-news/southport-southport-news/2013/06/20/sefton-council-leader-defends-development-proposals-outlined-for-the-borough-101022-33498028/
Our fragile Southport countryside is dwindling
away fast - thanks to Council-based, grey-suit, indifference and soon it may
become a distant folk memory that we nostalgically tell our children about.
Council hypocrisy…
My own children for example cannot accept or
understand the sheer insincerity of the situation after recently receiving a
prestigious Sefton Eco award from
the Mayor of Sefton, Maureen Fearn, who
glibly advised schoolchildren present that we all need to do our bit to cut
carbon emissions (i.e. go to work on your
bike and all that decidedly uncertain, pseudo-green thinking), ‘Save the
planet’ and similar global warmiac orientated platitudes…
Incidentally, when speaking about Kew’s
countryside, Maureen Fearn stated in the Southport Visiter back in 2005 that: “We have the land and we should be building on
it!”
Such amazing and hollow official double
standards are pathetic and remain largely vacant to the future generation!
And it is worth remembering that land generally
increases by 8-10 times in value with the granting of planning permission.
(Source: Alvin Hall, Presenter of BBC’s ‘Investing for All’ and Wall Street’s
most respected investment educator). Consequently, fat-cat development profiteering
must surely play a big part in the ongoing ‘Greenbelt-threatening’ Council
agenda that Southport is faced with today – or
am I being overtly mistrustful?
These
are a few more points of concern about Peter Dowd’s autocratic plan to flatten
our Southport countryside…
Councillors should be thinking ‘outside of the box’ herein, as we are
now undoubtedly fighting a real war to save the wonderful British countryside
from authoritarian – approved obliteration and this is NOT a game.
Peter Dowd advises that the council cannot
intervene to take up privately owned vacant houses etc. Therefore, I would propose
that a new law urgently needs to be approved by Parliament to give councils the
legal capacity to quickly reacquisition derelict and unoccupied properties that
could be renovated to provide new inner-city homes.
Many such privately owned places exist that have
fallen into ruin, such as the Ainsdale Brook pub eyesore on Sandbrook Way/Road intersection.
Old dilapidated properties not only look appalling
and attract antisocial activity but they could help greatly with housing
shortages if requisitioned.
Also, councils should stop approving new and surplus
superstores (e.g. like Tesco’s mini stores
that are breeding like mushrooms everywhere) in built up areas that ‘already’
have enough of the same. These areas would allow more housing too.
Furthermore, if house development is unavoidable
then why not, like our American cousins, build ‘upwards’ with skyscrapers to
save land capacity? It is much more eco-efficient to house 100 families vertically
than build a huge swath of 100 separate houses across 80% more acreage of
countryside.
Cllr Dowd also alleges that claims regarding new
cheap properties being built to house immigrants are a “Myth”. This comment
shows either precarious naivety or simply restrictive thinking.
Since the late 1990s immigration has added
approximately four million new people to the British populace and they ‘all’
need houses. This figure does not embrace
all of the illegal immigrants, the exact number of which is indefinite but is almost
certainly at least one million higher.
Is Cllr Dowd saying that our town has no
immigrants who will require cheap housing? This type of disorderly thinking really
is 100% ‘Cloud cuckoo’ land. England is one of the most thickly populated
countries in the world beating China, India and Japan hands down in this
respect.
The UK essentially cannot maintain the level of immigration that adds another one million people to the population every four to five years and this leads to additional housing crisis. We basically end up with an illogical situation relying on additional ‘cheap-labour’ immigrant to build houses that ‘they’ need for themselves.
Nowhere in Cllr Dowd’s remarks do I see any
mention of legally protected species being given any due consideration. Species
like water voles, natterjack toads; sand lizards etc need our help to survive
and Peter Dowd’s frenzied proposals are exactly what will drive many creatures into
final extinction. As such, his plans to roll in the bulldozers onto our
greenbelt may be construed as eco-fascism gone wild and also highly illegal
under current UK wildlife regulations.
So, this provably hypocritical council and its minions (along with other authorities across the UK) urgently need to oppose the dictatorial, anti-countryside, Government decree that is threatening our precious green places with extinction.
Enough is enough and I call for the public at
large to protest against such unacceptable eco-vandalism now!
More here on the old SSGB site...http://ssgb.150m.com/
Addendum: Protest against greenbelt destruction outside the Southport Town Hall on Thursday, 27 June 2013 at 5.45pm...
Pat Regan © 2013
This is cool!
ReplyDelete