Alan Turing: The Betrayal of a Hero by the Church’s Medieval Ethos

Images: Left: Alan Turing, 1928 passport photograph (Public Domain via Wikimedia Commons). Right: The imposing edifice of an institutional cathedral (Photograph © Pat Regan).

In 1952, the British state broke Alan Turing. They didn’t use a gallows or a stake; they used a syringe. The father of modern computer science, the man who broke the Enigma code and saved millions of lives from fascism, was subjected to state-sanctioned chemical castration.

His path to prosecution began when he reported a burglary at his home. During the routine police investigation, Turing naively but honestly acknowledged his relationship with a younger man, Arnold Murray, who was connected to the thief. Because consensual male relationships were completely illegal under British law at the time, the police immediately dropped the burglary inquiry and turned the full weight of the law against Turing himself. He was charged and convicted of 'gross indecency'. Two years after being forced to choose between prison or physical chemical castration, this national hero was dead.

While history books often frame Turing’s tragedy as an isolated failure of mid-century British law, let’s be entirely honest about the source: the British state didn't invent this cruelty - it inherited it from the Church.

As a Pagan, I look at Turing’s destruction and see the exact same machine that spent centuries burning our ancestors, chopping down our sacred groves, and erasing the fluid, diverse understandings of human nature that existed long before monotheism. The law used to destroy Turing was the direct legal descendant of King Henry VIII’s Buggery Act of 1533, which codified medieval Christian church dogma into secular law.

The Root of the Rot: A Culture Built on a Lie

To understand why they did this to a hero like Turing, we have to look at what lies beneath all Abrahamic faith systems. As I have exposed before, these faiths are built on The Great Lie - a total myth. Secular scholars and modern archaeology have proven that characters like Abraham are nothing more than literary inventions. There is no contemporary physical evidence, no monuments, and no signatures.

Yet, for centuries, our society has been trapped in this clever piece of fiction. When a culture’s roots are rotten, the branches fall off, and it dies. And the rotten branch that broke Alan Turing was the arrogant belief that a man-made book of ancient folklore gives the state the divine authority to police human bodies, manipulate minds, and destroy natural human variance.

The Abrahamic worldview fundamentally portrays "Man as the Lead Actor and Earth as the Stage," pursuing a sterile, unchanging perfection while despising the real, organic world. Because they view nature as 'fallen' or something to be conquered, they cannot tolerate anyone who lives outside their synthetic script. Turing’s natural, organic orientation was a threat to their control. So, just like the modern politicians who view nature as a broken machine to be engineered from a boardroom, the 1950s court system treated Turing’s biology like a carbon ledger that needed to be forcibly rewritten.

If you think this violent ethos died with Turing in 1954, or that the Church has genuinely repented, you are missing the battlefield right in front of you. The strategy has merely evolved, using the exact same Abrahamic worksheet to control the trusting masses today:

1. The Modern Torture: Suppressing Human Nature

Turing was forced to take synthetic estrogen to 'cure' his nature - a medicalised form of torture justified by religious morality. Today, that exact same impulse thrives under the banner of coercive practices meant to forcibly alter an individual's natural orientation. Fundamentalist Christian groups globally fight tooth and nail to protect their 'right' to use psychological manipulation and shame to break young minds. The underlying belief is identical to 1952: who you naturally are is a moral failure that must be forcibly rewritten to satisfy their dogma.

2. The War on Bodily Autonomy

The current political and cultural obsession with policing human bodies and identities is being heavily driven and preached from fundamentalist Christian pulpits. The rhetoric is a carbon copy of the language used against Turing. They call individuals who do not conform to traditional gender expectations "threats to the natural order." For centuries, the Church has claimed a monopoly on defining what is 'natural,' using its power to crush anyone whose body or identity reflects the beautiful, fluid diversity of the actual Earth.

3. The Exportation of Oppression

Where the Church loses its grip on power in secularised Western nations, it exports its medieval violence elsewhere. Western evangelical organisations have poured massive financial resources into the Global South - most notably lobbying for draconian laws that criminalise personal relationships in nations like Uganda and Ghana. Laws that carry the death penalty or lifetime imprisonment for private individuals are being drafted by hands holding Bibles. The Church didn’t reform; it just relocated its worst atrocities to where it can still pull the levers of state power.

The Pagan Resistance

Our ancient Pagan ancestors knew they were a part of nature, not 'apart' from it. In the real, natural world, there is no demonic adversary and no cosmic sin - there is only cause and effect. Nature loves variety. It thrives on chaotic diversity, balance, and the infinite expressions of life.

The persecution of Alan Turing was a crime against Nature itself, perpetrated by an institutional system of psychological manipulation built on fantasy and old-time propaganda.

 We cannot let them rewrite history to frame a true hero's death as an isolated accident. It was a theological hit. And until we completely dismantle the fraudulent Abrahamic programming that treats natural human variation as a sin, the high priests of control will keep claiming victims.

Lessons From Blackpool's 120 Tremors: A Major Calamity Still Waiting to Happen

 

A few years back, fracking in Lancashire ground to a halt after a series of earth tremors shook Blackpool. Yet, things were actually far worse than many realised.

Official records from the British Geological Survey show that over 120 distinct tremors were recorded across the Fylde coast area during the 2018 and 2019 drilling windows. In one single month of active fracturing, the site registered dozens of micro-quakes, repeatedly breaching the government's strict "traffic light" safety thresholds.

Image above contains British Geological Survey materials © UKRI. Crown Copyright used under the Open Government Licence.

The chaotic experiment reached a rapid climax on 26 August 2019, when an alarming 2.9 magnitude earthquake struck the area. This record-breaking tremor served as the final straw, forcing the government to impose an immediate, indefinite moratorium on UK fracking.

The political fallout was swift. Even the Tory-led Lancashire County Council voted unanimously to demand the government stick to its manifesto commitment against fracking, demanding total clarity on what actually constitutes "local consent" for this controversial energy extraction.

Do we really want to go back to this?

History teaches us that gambling with nature is a uniquely bad idea. When the UK Government finally ended its support for fracking, it did so based on new scientific analysis. The conclusion was simple: with current technology, it is impossible to accurately predict the probability or scale of tremors associated with the practice.

The simple truth is that UK geology is far more complex and fractured than the sprawling, open shale fields of the United States. That is exactly why operators like Cuadrilla kept hitting an immovable wall of earthquakes. When you combine this problematic, fragile geology with our high-density population, fracking inevitably takes place right next to people's homes. It is a major calamity just waiting to happen.

The industry’s failure in the region culminated in June 2026, when Lancashire County Council ordered the Preston New Road site to be permanently plugged, abandoned, and completely restored to agricultural farmland. 

The Legal Restoration Deadlines

• 8 November 2026 (Infrastructure Removal): This is the final deadline to clear out everything on the surface. Cuadrilla must remove all remaining buildings, security huts, acoustic perimeter fencing, pollution-control membranes, concrete hardstanding, and aggregate drilling compounds.
• 8 December 2026 (Subsoil Layering): After the heavy equipment and foundations are gone, contractors must completely replace and grade the underlying subsoil across the pad.
• 8 January 2027 (Agricultural Handover): The final deadline. The original topsoil layer must be re-laid, and the site must be left fully optimised and restored back into usable agricultural farmland. 

Nevertheless, as we look out from the Southport coastline, it seems the establishment has learned absolutely nothing. The exact same high-pressure, top-down geological gambling is merely being rebranded under the banner of Net Zero.

Right on our doorstep in Liverpool Bay, the multi-billion-pound HyNet Carbon Capture project is preparing to pump millions of tonnes of compressed, liquid-state CO₂ directly into the seabed.

For the desk-bound officials and project insiders who react defensively to public scrutiny, the geological hurdles facing this project are documented in black and white by structural geologists. 

Independent seismic profiling highlights that significant portions of the Liverpool Bay reservoirs - such as the Hamilton and Lennox fields - lie shallower than the 800-metre depth threshold required to easily maintain CO₂ in its most stable state. Geomechanical mapping shows that pumping massive volumes of high-pressure, liquid-state CO₂ back into depleted structures reverses decades of geological stabilisation, narrowing the margin to fracturing thresholds and increasing the potential for fault reactivation.

When we raise concerns about induced micro-seismicity or localised ocean acidification from potential subsea containment failures, we are quoting documented geological assessments. No amount of corporate public relations or defensive comment-thread tangents can change the physical fractures in the Irish Sea bed.

With political winds always shifting, and short-sighted ministers forever eyeing a U-turn, we must ask: how long before they steer us into another technological iceberg and bring tears to local maritime and coastal communities all over again?

The corporate planners think they can treat the Irish Sea like a giant, high-pressure disposal unit. But history teaches us that nature always bats last. In these coastal parts, generations of seafaring folk knew to respect the power of Manannán - the ancient god of these waters who wrapped our shores in mist and claimed the ships of those who foolishly underestimated the sea.

Above: the skeletal remains of the Star of Hope, driven onto Ainsdale beach from the USA during a fierce Force 10 gale in 1883. Standing beside her timbers today, the ominous energy of that fateful night still lingers; a silent, haunting reminder from Manannán that the Irish Sea always has the final word. 

Manannán has a long history of forcing his wrath on those who treat his waters with arrogance. 

They can tow in their multi-million-pound rigs, but if they think they can manipulate complex subsea faults without the Irish Sea pushing back, they are in for a very rude awakening.

CASH RIGS 

Make no mistake: this is not about saving the planet; it is about securing a corporate gold rush. The Church of Climate Alarmism has successfully engineered the ultimate multi-billion-pound corporate welfare scheme, where multinational conglomerates are handed billions in taxpayer-backed subsidies to pump a natural trace gas right back into the very holes they originally profited from digging. 

SOUTHPORT AIR SHOW 2026 - Photos from 30th August.

 

Here is a small selection of photos from the last day of the Air Show, which took place on Sunday, 30th August. 

More: 

https://pat-regan.blogspot.com/2026/08/southport-air-show-29-august-2026-few.html 

;'

THE CONCRETE INVASION NEAR TO RAF WOODVALE: THE CORPORATE DESTRUCTION OF THE ENGLISH COUNTRYSIDE

Ongoing bureaucratic arrogance and unchecked corporate box-ticking are currently driving the concrete invasion of our pristine, natural wildlife corridors right here at the Woodvale boundary lanes.

As one looks toward the boundary lines of the RAF airfield today, the ongoing construction work is already underway, and the construction fencing is locked down into the turf. The administrative machinery wants us to look at this destruction and believe it is a fait accompli - a done deal that is simply too late to be stopped. That is a favourite authoritarian psychological ploy. They rush the diggers onto our turf to breed compliance and quiet defeat among the local population. But even if the concrete cannot be physically clawed back, the fight for absolute accountability is only just beginning. If this vital, natural wildlife buffer zone is to be permanently sacrificed, then every single brick laid will stand as a permanent public monument to the distant planning decisions that betrayed our borough's heritage. They might have started the physical work, but we will ensure the community never forgets the system layout that signed the land's death warrant.

The visual layout of the map reveals the true environmental and infrastructural recklessness of this top-down development scheme. The targeted construction zone sits directly across Wham Dyke, a critical, low-lying watercourse situated on the west side of the A565 Formby Bypass, directly south of the airfield perimeter. This isn’t just an ordinary drainage ditch; it is a highly sensitive local habitat that serves as the immediate buffer zone for the Freshfield Dune Heath Nature Reserve. Furthermore, official ecological surveys have documented that this specific watercourse is home to a vulnerable colony of protected water voles - a species legally shielded from disruption. Replacing this absorbent, marshy natural corridor with massive concrete foundations and a sprawling 286-home housing estate flies directly in the face of local conservation logic.

But the most heartbreaking cost of this concrete encroachment isn't measured in traffic delays - it is printed on the tarmac in blood. 

Photographic evidence speaks for itself of dead roe deer struck down by vehicles on this exact stretch of the Formby Bypass. These beautiful, native animals have used the mosslands, fields, and the adjacent Freshfield Dune Heath for generations. When corporate developers pave over their ancient foraging grounds and hem in their natural runways with high-density housing layouts, they don't "mitigate" wildlife - they actively trap it. 

They force terrified animals straight through boundary fences and directly into the path of fast-moving vehicles. Such a tragic bypass photograph is the direct, physical indictment of what happens when distant box-tickers prioritise developer margins over the living ecology of our coastal habitats.

The failure spreads directly off the turf, onto our local highways, and into our skies. The Formby Bypass is traditionally a fast, 60 mph dual-carriageway, yet the current layout has locked motorists into confusing, temporary 30 mph restrictions outside the housing site entrance. The physical reality on the tarmac today is frequently chaos, with drivers actively ignoring the 30 mph signs out of pure frustration and continuing to fly past the site entrance at 60 mph. The long-term reality is even worse. To accommodate the massive influx of vehicle movements from these 286 new properties, the planning layout demands a permanent reduction to 50 mph alongside a completely new signalled junction sliced right into the main artery. 

Shoving traffic lights onto a high-speed coastal bypass lanes layout is an absolute recipe for permanent gridlock. It represents a total failure of administrative foresight, turning a vital transport artery into a stagnant bottleneck simply to satisfy corporate developer margins while the local community pays the long-term infrastructural price.

The raw reality on the turf today is a visible engineering panic; the contractors are actively raising the concrete levels higher, desperately trying to lift their high-profit platforms out of the natural water level of the mosses. The administrative planners claim that mitigation measures and wetland buffers will magically control the displaced surface water, but the existing residents on Brackenway, Deansgate Park, Paradise Lane, Hawksworth Drive, and the surrounding boundary avenues know the physical reality of this floodplain layout far better than any distant corporate spreadsheet. When you artificially elevate an entire development footprint and cover a natural watercourse buffer with asphalt and brick, you don't manage a flood; you actively redirect it toward established doorsteps across the entire district.

Furthermore, the infrastructural failure spreads directly off the tarmac and into the skies above. The visual layout reveals that this targeted construction zone sits underneath the active operational flight paths for RAF Woodvale. During the planning discussions, the Ministry of Defence itself raised serious concerns, explicitly reminding the planners that the site sits squarely within the airfield's bird strike safeguarding zone. By forcing artificial wetland features and drainage ponds onto this marshy plot to cope with displaced water, the developers are creating a massive ecological draw for large flocks of hazardous birds right on the approach line of military training aircraft. 

When you combine this bird strike risk with the fact that the developers are actively seeking to radically alter the topography by raising the physical ground levels to escape the active floodplain, you create a logistical nightmare. They aren't just creating an unsafe environment on the ground; they are squeezing the safety margins of our local airspace. The system planners can ignore these physical boundaries on their computer screens, but a fast dual-carriageway and an active military runway do not bend to corporate spreadsheets.

Predictable as clockwork, the architects of these top-down schemes will attempt to wave the flag of "progress," claiming that high-profit estates are an essential necessity for housing and local employment [1.56]. Let us expose that spin for what it is. No one is standing against legitimate local jobs, nor are we blind to the authentic housing needs of future generations. But true progress does not demand the systematic destruction of our natural defences, nor does it require paving over low-lying floodplains right across a critical watercourse like Wham Dyke. Building expensive developments on an active marshy buffer zone isn't "progress" - it is a calculated corporate calculation that prioritises short-term developer margins over the long-term safety and infrastructure stability of the existing community. To label the defence of our rare ecosystems, protected wildlife, and established drainage layouts as "anti-progress" is a desperate attempt to deflect from poor planning. True ecologically-minded progress builds with the landscape, not on top of it.

The proof of my own connection to this landscape is stamped right onto my Gran Rhoda’s 1890 birth certificate. While she was born on Shaftesbury Road in Birkdale, her entry was legally registered under the historic Formby Sub-District. Her mother, my great-grandmother Margaret Rimmer, belonged to the ancient, traditional Rimmer lines whose generations of labour shaped this entire West Lancashire coastal plain - from the sandhills to the mosses. Whether her specific cradle sat on Formby farmland, the low-lying Altcar marshes, or the fields bordering Woodvale, the historical conclusion remains identical. I am not an outside commentator footprinting on this turf. I am a direct descendant of the traditional agricultural workers who nurtured this sub-district soil generations before modern corporate developers or distant council planners ever sat at a desk.

The very same administrative layout that lectures everyday residents about saving the planet - telling us to abandon our vehicles and go to work on a bicycle—is the exact same system that happily signs off on pristine green space the moment a heavy corporate housing spreadsheet lands on the table [1.21, 1.56]. It is a massive misdirection of public priorities. They pour energy into superficial green box-ticking press releases to satisfy distant quotas, while the living heritage of our coast is systematically flattened under a sea of concrete and steel.

They can easily find the bureaucratic focus to manage dead, non-functional infrastructure, yet our historic Southport Pier has sat locked up and decaying, and beloved community hubs like the Botanic Gardens aviary are starved of basic resources. This is not progress; it is an ideological shell game. They may have the piling rigs, the legal teams, and the grey fencing on the field today, but they will never possess the history, the heritage, or the unyielding voice of the people who actually belong to this coast.

ADDENDUM: THE OFFICIAL RECORD CONFIRMS THE RISK

For those corporate apologists and distant box-tickers who still attempt to brand these infrastructure, drainage, and wildlife concerns as simple "hyperbole," let us anchor the truth firmly into the public record. Official Sefton Council Planning Committee files for application DC/2018/00093 explicitly document the severe, low-lying flood risks across these fields, noting that extensive "ground re-profiling" is mandatory simply to cope with the displaced surface water layout. 

The official records confirm that the community did not sit back in silence; the council received 11 separate local petitions explicitly detailing the catastrophic threat to drainage networks, local highways, and delicate coastal ecology. Furthermore, the council's official Late Representations files expose that the planning committee chose to override the explicit, structured objections of local representatives—including Councillor Bob McCann, who formally endorsed and led the massive community petitions on behalf of residents. While even distant political figures and the Formby Parish Council were forced to acknowledge the threat, it was the dedicated local independent network that held the line, explicitly warning the borough about the severe long-term dangers to the drainage layouts on Brackenway and Hawksworth Drive.

The administrative planners can ignore these deep neighbourhood warnings, but their own public documentation stands as a permanent indictment of the risks they chose to override. 

Ultimately, this entire masterplan farce remains a stark, heartbreaking case study in the corporate destruction of the English countryside. It represents the permanent sacrifice of precious local heritage assets—all to satisfy distant bureaucratic spreadsheets and developer margins—through an avoidable environmental tragedy that leaves the community to bear the long-term cost. 

More: 

https://pa.sefton.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=documents&keyVal=P2LTV7NWL5V00