Dr Pugh: fence-sitting and typical political spin to cultivate brownie points from trusting residents…?
Not
all, but a lot of Southport residents fall for the spin, time and time again,
from clever politicians …
The
following is a little refresher with a few extracts from one of my books, Dirty Politics .
John
Pugh MP appears to follow the same channel of unconfirmed scientific theory as
many others, which leads councils to ultimately enforce AWC (fortnightly waste collections) on residents. Does this local politician, and numerous
others who follow suit, urge constituents to 'support' unconfirmed
eco-protocols that could cost us £76 Trillion, according to some experts?
I fairly asked some time ago if
Southport’s MP John Pugh had jumped on the environmental bandwagon via his
latest endorsement for climate alarmism in the Southport media. Does he know more about this issue
than 18,000 scientists who opposed the Kyoto Protocol that we observed earlier
in this book? Dr Pugh stated:
“The
scale of the problem of global warming is awesome"
John Pugh MP - Champion, 4th Jan. 2006
John Pugh MP - Midweek Visitor - 4th Jan. 2006
Is John Pugh MP the new
'Eco-Champion' of the masses against alleged man-made global warming (MMGW) or
just one more 'out of touch' politician following the herd into unproven and
mega-costly eco incentives? So does Southport 's
climate alarmist, Mr Pugh, know more about the subject than numerous experts
who now dismiss such sham-science?
Of course Dr Pugh, Bill Milburn for Sefton
Council, and their fellow climate alarmists are not alone in banging this
ambiguous eco-war drum.
The BBC reported in March 2007 that
Environment minister Ben Bradshaw said pilot schemes with fortnightly
collections had revealed an increase in the amount of recycling. Flying the
characteristic climate alarmist flag, he considered recycling as a,
"major
part of our battle against climate change".
Recycling household waste, he added,
was
“the equivalent of taking 3.5 million cars off the road".
Oh really; but how significant would
this figure be , if at all, to saving the world from the perceived iniquity of
the horseless carriage so widely besmirched by the devout followers of
quasi-religious MMGW doctrine?
According to the Association of British
Drivers (ABD) mankind is accountable for only 3.5% of total global carbon cycle
CO2 emissions and cars are responsible for only one-seventh of that 3.5%.
This amounts to just 0.5% of total
emissions. ABD says that if every single car vanished from the surface of the
planet overnight, there would be no quantifiable plunge in atmospheric carbon
dioxide levels and absolutely no impact whatsoever on climate change.
This would appear to make Mr
Bradshaw’s, Pugh’s and Milburn’s frantic climate claims over emissions about as
practical as a well-used chocolate tea pot. They may be big on hype, agenda and
propaganda but their alleged facts sadly leave plenty to be desired! Whosoever
furnishes these good gents with data needs to take a rain check really fast!
As stated to the ABD by a delegate
attending an emissions trading conference in England
“Global warming
isn't about the environment, it's about politics, trade and taxes.”
I
must in all honesty, after checking available data - rather than accepting
typical third-hand MMGW political propaganda, agree with that preceding
assertion.
The
MMGW issue is one of the biggest scams ever pulled over the trusting global
masses.
I also note here that I am not alone
in reaching this conclusion for the founder of the Weather Channel in the US
has described the concept of global warming as “The greatest scam in history”
and accused the worldwide media of colluding with 'environmental extremists' to
frighten the public.
In an article published on the
International Climate and Environmental Change Assessment Project, which is
known for challenging run of the mill theories on global warming John Coleman
wrote:
"It is the greatest scam in history. I am
amazed, appalled and highly offended by it. Global Warming; It is a SCAM,"
I wrote more on this transparent fiasco here…
No comments:
Post a Comment